Observing Time Calculation: Help Page


Contents: 1. Description of the program.
2. First observation type: spectroscopy with one single set of frequency.
3. Second observation type: spectroscopy with up to five frequency sets.
4. Bolometer observations.
5. Observing modes description.
6. Overheads and deadtimes calculation.
7. Special features.

1. Program description

The purpose of this program is to provide an estimation of the observing time required at the IRAM 30m telescope for a given type of spectral line or continuum observation. The formulas used in this Time Estimator are described in the the corresponding Description Report (see also the Jan. 95 Newsletter and the 30m Manual ). The most recent values of the telescope and receiver parameters are used.

The Time Estimator in its updated version handles three types of spectroscopic observations where (i) one or more sources are observed with the same set of frequencies, (ii) one source is observed with up to five different sets of frequencies, and (iii) one or more sources are observed with the MPIfR Bolometer.

This tool works through several fill-out forms containing the parameters we consider as necessary to estimate the telescope time at the moment of a proposal writting. It uses two connected web pages and offers the possibility to quickly have an idea of the way any parameter may change the integration or total telescope time. By that way, we also hope this tool could help observers who don't have a good experience of the 30m to get more familiar with the telescope.

It is expected that this Time Estimator is most helpful for novice 30m observers. More seasoned 30m users however may find it useful as well, since the tool makes use of the most recent receivers parameters.

2. First observation type

2.1 Description: This case is dedicated to the observation of a series of sources with the same combination of frequencies (we call it "frequency set"). This set is presented as a table containing the receiver and backend information, and is displayed on the first page. Since we do not simulate the evolution of the source elevation (and thus the opacity), we ask for an "average elevation". A check of frequency ratio is achieved for each dewar in order to estimate losses due to the Martin-Pupplet. If thoses losses arise 10% or more, we display a warning message.

When the first page is complete, the [Int. time calculation] button allows to compute the required integration time for every chosen receiver. It simultaneoulsy displays on the second page some warning/advise messages and gives an estimation of the total telescope time (i.e. observation of all the sources) by considering default values for the observing mode parameters. You can change those values and resubmit the complete calculation with the [Obs. time calculation] button located at the bottom of the second page. When you are satisfied with the calculation, a LaTeX file containing the main results is generated with the [LaTeX file generation] button. You can include it in your proposal.
For special features associated to this case, see Chapter 7

Please note that any of the submitted parameters will be applied to all the sources of your project (ie no distinction in sky elevation, line strength, line width...)

2.2 Parameters:

First Page Parameters:

Second Page Parameters:

The first table on this page deals with the integration time required with each of the selected receivers to reach the requested r.m.s. Then, some warning/advise messages will appear with respect to the results and according to our experience with such observations. The boxes displayed on this page handle some parameters of the observing mode (check special features of On-The-Fly mode). We use default values for all parameters to allow complete calculation on the first submit. But you can modify those parameters to your own observing goals and recompute the results. The last table breaks the total telescope time down into several tasks and gives the overall observing efficiency (ON source integration time over total telescope time). For the estimation of overheads and deadtimes, see the corresponding section.

2.3 Special warnings:

The complete results displayed on the second window account for all the sources and sometimes the total time may be much higher than the one of a typical uninterrupted observing session (say 8-12 hours). Since we consider only one tuning for the run (as if the run could be done without leaving the telescope to another project), the total observing time requested should be increased by a certain number of "tuning times". See the overheads and deadtimes section to know about the time it corresponds to.

3. Second observation type

3.1 Description: This case is dedicated to the observation of a given source with a series of frequencies combinations (we call them "frequency sets"). Those sets are presented as a table containing the receiver and backend information for all sets, and displayed on the first web page. Currently. we limit the number of sets to 5. Since we do not simulate the evolution of the source elevation (and thus the opacity), we ask for an "average elevation". A check of frequency ratio is achieved for each dewar in order to estimate losses due to the Martin-Pupplet. If thoses losses arise 10% or more, we display a warning message.

When the first window is complete, the [Int. time calculation] button allows to compute the required integration time for every chosen receiver of each set. It simultaneoulsy displays on the second window some warning/advise messages and gives an estimation of the total telescope time for all the sets by considering default values for the observing mode parameters. You can change those values and resubmit the complete calculation with the [Obs. time calculation] button located at the bottom of the second window. When you are satisfied with the calculation, a LaTeX file containing the main results is generated with the [LaTeX file generation] button. You can include it in your proposal.
For special features associated to this case, see Chapter 7

Please note that some parameters, such as the complete backend configuration per receiver, and the observing mode, are the same for all frequency sets, this to avoid a too complex management of the program.

Consequence: In case of velocity smoothing, the Time Estimator uses the frequency bandwidth corresponding to the lowest frequency for each receiver occurring in the 5 sets.

  3.2 Parameters:

First Page Parameters:

Second Page Parameters:

The first table on this page deals with the integration time required with each of the selected receivers to reach the requested r.m.s. Then, some warning/advise messages will appear with respect to the results and according to our experience with such observations. The boxes displayed on this page handle some parameters of the observing mode (check special features of On-The-Fly mode). We use default values for all parameters to allow complete calculation on the first submit. But you can modify those parameters to your own observing goals and recompute the results. The last table breaks the total telescope time down into several tasks and gives the overall observing efficiency (ON source integration time over total telescope time). For the estimation of overheads and deadtimes, see the corresponding section.

4. Bolometer observation

4.1 Description: This case is dedicated to continuum observation with the MPIfR bolometer during the winter period. The complete form is displayed on one single page containing both information for On-off and On-the-fly modes. In order to reduce the number of parameters to be specified, we assume typical values for some of them, such as the average elevation of the sources (~ 40-60 deg.), zenith opacity (~ 0.2) or the wobbler throw (~ 45 arcsec.). Currently, it is mandatory to choose between On-off and On-the-fly observation.

When the first page is complete, the [Obs. time calculation] button allows to compute an estimation of the total required telescope time for the run. It simultaneoulsy displays on the second page some warning/advise messages. When you are satisfied with the calculation, a LaTeX file containing the main results is generated with the [LaTeX file generation] button. You can include it in your proposal.

Please note that any of the submitted parameters will be applied to all the sources of your project (ie no distinction in sky elevation, source strength, source size...)

4.2 Parameters:

First Page Parameters: - On-off parameters:

- On-the-fly parameters:
- Other information:

Second Page Parameters:

The second page, displayed on the second window, gives a description of the time partition corresponding to the computed run. For the details about the way this is done, see the overheads and deadtimes section.

4.3 Special warnings:

We would like to insist on the fact that the observers should be very carefully with the requested sizes of the maps. Indeed, long scan will suffer from field rotation and bad baseline. To avoid this problem, smallest maps can be done separatly. Since the program can not "cut" maps by itself, the observer shall submit two "sub-maps" and add himself the times required for the proposal.

5. Observing mode parameters

Each time the results page is displayed, boxes containing the observing mode parameters are shown with default values. As follow, we give a description of those parameters for each mode. Some of them are not required in the fill-out form and appear in bold with the default value we assign to them.

- Position Switching parameters:

- Wobbler Switching parameters:

- Frequency Switching parameters:

- Raster Mapping parameters:

- Spectral Line On-The-Fly parameters:

For this mode, the number of possibilities and observing strategies has become so important in the latest times that the observing sequence we consider can sometimes look simple compared to what you really want to do. However, we think that this is still consistent in terms of time estimation for a map of a given size with a given scanning step. Anyhow, don't hesitate to contact us for questions or doubts you may have. 6. Overheads and deadtimes

The results of the total telescope time calculation are displayed in a table giving how this time is parted between the preparation and observing phases. The way the overhead and deadtimes are estimated is the following:

7. Special features

7.1 Two receivers tuned to the same freq.: The program now takes into account the tuning of two receivers at the same frequency and informs about the gain in time it represents. To respect cases where a better r.m.s. would be prefered to a shorter telescope time, the total time partition is still given as if there was no receiver average. This check is done for case 1 and all individual sets of case 2.

7.2 Aimed to spatially smooth your maps?: In some cases, you might wish to spatially smooth the maps obtained with SL-On-The-Fly. This allows to get per final pixel a better r.m.s. If you fix the required r.m.s. this should correspond to a gain in observing time. We do not offer the option to directly apply smoothing factors to simulate this gain because the r.m.s. we ask for in the form does not correspond to the noise you would get per pixel after smoothing ! Indeed, the r.m.s. we require is a r.m.s. per main beam (in the Ta* scale).
-----> To simulate the effective time gain of the smooth, one would then have to enter the final requested r.m.s. want multiplied by the sqrt of the size ratio applied between the original and final sampling.

Example: Say you map a source with original 4"*4" pixels. You aim to smooth to a 12"*12" grid. The ratio is then 9. If you need a noise of 0.05K in the final sampling, the input of the form should be 0.15K If you had required 0.05K per main beam, the time would have been 9 times larger.


To come back to the Observing time calculation page, press the back button of your browser.